Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSGX vs RNWHX
FSSGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSSGX vs RNWHX
FSSGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FSSGX (130M). FSSGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FSSGX (1.26) vs RNWHX (1.15). FSSGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSSGX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSSGX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSSGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.96 vs. RNWHX (31.15).
| FSSGX | RNWHX | FSSGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.72 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.933 | 18.743 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.96 | 31.15 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.54 | 57.37 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement