Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSGX vs RNWHX
FSSGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSSGX vs RNWHX
FSSGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FSSGX (132M). FSSGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FSSGX (1.26) vs RNWHX (1.14). FSSGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSSGX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSSGX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSSGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.25 vs. RNWHX (19.47).
| FSSGX | RNWHX | FSSGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.72 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.182 | 12.651 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.14 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.25 | 19.47 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.15 | 43.67 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.04 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers