Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSKX vs GFACX
FSSKX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FSSKX vs GFACX
FSSKX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSKX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSKX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSSKX (11.3B). FSSKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FSSKX (0.44) vs GFACX (0.00). FSSKX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FSSKX (18 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSSKX (0.42). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSSKX (13.00). FSSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FSSKX (0) vs GFACX (250). FSSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.83 vs. GFACX (-3.55). FSSKX return over 5 years is better than : 61.47 vs. GFACX (2.63).
| FSSKX | GFACX | FSSKX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.35 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.35 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.173 | 7.816 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.83 | -3.55 | -559% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.33 | 34.52 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.47 | 2.63 | 2,336% |
| Returns for 10 years | 211.26 | 79.52 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers