Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSKX vs GFACX
FSSKX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FSSKX vs GFACX
FSSKX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSKX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSKX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FSSKX (10.8B). FSSKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FSSKX (0.46) vs GFACX (0.00). FSSKX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FSSKX (18 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSSKX (0.42). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSSKX (13.00). FSSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FSSKX (0) vs GFACX (250). FSSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.43 vs. GFACX (5.89). FSSKX return over 5 years is better than : 65.33 vs. GFACX (6.08).
| FSSKX | GFACX | FSSKX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.35 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.35 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.577 | 5.973 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 361B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.43 | 5.89 | 516% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.56 | 36.71 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.33 | 6.08 | 1,074% |
| Returns for 10 years | 226.19 | 88.28 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers