Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSKX vs RGAEX
FSSKX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts FSSKX vs RGAEX
FSSKX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSKX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSKX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSSKX (11.3B). FSSKX pays higher dividends than RGAEX: FSSKX (0.44) vs RGAEX (0.21). FSSKX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: FSSKX (18 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). RGAEX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSSKX (0.42). RGAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSSKX (13.00). FSSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAEX: FSSKX (0) vs RGAEX (250). FSSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.83 vs. RGAEX (-0.00). FSSKX return over 5 years is better than : 60.95 vs. RGAEX (12.98).
| FSSKX | RGAEX | FSSKX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.63 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.63 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.203 | 9.051 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.21 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.83 | -0.00 | -4,186,468% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.33 | 42.68 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.95 | 12.98 | 470% |
| Returns for 10 years | 211.25 | 105.92 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers