Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSKX vs RGAFX
FSSKX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSKX vs RGAFX
FSSKX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSKX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSKX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSSKX (11.3B). RGAFX (0.46) and FSSKX (0.44) have matching dividends . FSSKX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FSSKX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FSSKX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSSKX (13.00). FSSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FSSKX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FSSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.83 vs. RGAFX (0.42). FSSKX return over 5 years is better than : 60.95 vs. RGAFX (14.74).
| FSSKX | RGAFX | FSSKX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.34 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.34 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.203 | 9.276 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.46 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.83 | 0.42 | 4,501% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.33 | 44.36 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.95 | 14.74 | 413% |
| Returns for 10 years | 211.25 | 109.80 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers