Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs FZAOX
FSSNX vs FZAOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs FZAOX
FSSNX vs FZAOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. FZAOX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and FZAOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. FZAOX (2.37B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than FZAOX: FSSNX (1.05) vs FZAOX (0.03). FSSNX was incepted earlier than FZAOX: FSSNX (15 years) vs FZAOX (13 years). FZAOX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FZAOX (34.00). FSSNX (0) and FZAOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. FZAOX (17.42). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. FZAOX (12.32).
| FSSNX | FZAOX | FSSNX / FZAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.495 | 16.699 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 2.37B | 1,454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.03 | 3,270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | 17.42 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.87 | 41.18 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | 12.32 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.89 | 63.43 | 222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement