Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GMAPX
FSSNX vs GMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GMAPX
FSSNX vs GMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GMAPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and GMAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. GMAPX (803M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GMAPX: FSSNX (0.92) vs GMAPX (0.57). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GMAPX: FSSNX (15 years) vs GMAPX (8 years). GMAPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and GMAPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. GMAPX (33.75). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. GMAPX (-0.25).
| FSSNX | GMAPX | FSSNX / GMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 19.293 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 803M | 4,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.57 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 33.75 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 51.51 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -0.25 | -13,248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement