Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GMAPX
FSSNX vs GMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GMAPX
FSSNX vs GMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GMAPX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and GMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. GMAPX (1.01B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GMAPX: FSSNX (1.06) vs GMAPX (0.56). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GMAPX: FSSNX (15 years) vs GMAPX (8 years). GMAPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and GMAPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. GMAPX (27.88). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. GMAPX (4.48).
| FSSNX | GMAPX | FSSNX / GMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 21.250 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 1.01B | 3,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.56 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 27.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 41.33 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 4.48 | 851% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers