Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GQSCX
FSSNX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GQSCX
FSSNX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jul 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. GQSCX (4.24M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FSSNX (1.02) vs GQSCX (0.31). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs GQSCX (9 years). GQSCX (3.77) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and GQSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GQSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.65 vs. FSSNX (35.44). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. GQSCX (41.58).
| FSSNX | GQSCX | FSSNX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 3.77 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.700 | 26.531 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 4.24M | 824,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.31 | 333% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.44 | 43.65 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.43 | 54.44 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 41.58 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers