Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GQSCX
FSSNX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GQSCX
FSSNX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and GQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. GQSCX (3.66M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs GQSCX (0.33). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs GQSCX (9 years). GQSCX (3.77) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and GQSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.74 vs. GQSCX (39.30). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.71 vs. GQSCX (27.85).
| FSSNX | GQSCX | FSSNX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 3.77 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.108 | 17.651 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 3.66M | 928,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.33 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.74 | 39.30 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.87 | 48.09 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.71 | 27.85 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement