Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GQSCX
FSSNX vs GQSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GQSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.13
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
Price$13.91
Change+$0.10 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16M
FSSNX vs GQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GQSCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and GQSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. GQSCX (2.16M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GQSCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs GQSCX (0.46). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GQSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GQSCX (8 years). GQSCX (3.65) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GQSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX (0) and GQSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. GQSCX (-3.94). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 64.11 vs. GQSCX (58.04).
| FSSNX | GQSCX | FSSNX / GQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 3.65 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.626 | -1.553 | -105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 2.16M | 1,186,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.46 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | -3.94 | -309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.67 | 20.13 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.11 | 58.04 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement