Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$16.09
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets794.92M
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. GSCZX (795M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (1.13) vs GSCZX (0.22). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.91 vs. GSCZX (-7.66). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 93.66 vs. GSCZX (54.40).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.465 | -8.947 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 795M | 3,044% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.22 | 510% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.91 | -7.66 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.00 | -10.45 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.66 | 54.40 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.36 | -8.77 | -642% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers