Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.52
Change+$0.10 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets863.8M
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and GSCZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. GSCZX (864M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (0.92) vs GSCZX (0.21). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. GSCZX (-3.54). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. GSCZX (22.89).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | -0.793 | -278% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 864M | 2,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.21 | 438% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -3.54 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 10.87 | 289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 22.89 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.15 | 1.63 | 5,053% |