Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.86
Change+$0.20 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$18.26
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets905.86M
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Oct 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and GSCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. GSCZX (906M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (0.82) vs GSCZX (0.20). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.00 vs. GSCZX (0.43). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 65.90 vs. GSCZX (24.81).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.766 | 3.001 | 359% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 906M | 3,135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.20 | 414% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.00 | 0.43 | 3,055% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.94 | 20.97 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.90 | 24.81 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.94 | 12.36 | 898% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement