Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$24.40
Change+$0.48 (+2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$15.61
Change+$0.31 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets780.91M
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. GSCZX (781M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (1.13) vs GSCZX (0.22). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.38 vs. GSCZX (-8.47). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. GSCZX (30.60).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.584 | -13.364 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 781M | 3,099% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.22 | 510% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | -8.47 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.09 | -10.59 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.71 | 30.60 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.50 | -13.83 | -358% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers