Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and GSCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. GSCZX (986M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (1.05) vs GSCZX (0.24). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (15 years) vs GSCZX (25 years). GSCZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSSNX (80.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. GSCZX (3.60). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. GSCZX (-11.13).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.495 | 13.571 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 986M | 3,499% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.24 | 444% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | 3.60 | 583% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.87 | 21.40 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | -11.13 | -325% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.89 | 20.79 | 678% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement