Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. GSCZX (1.03B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (1.02) vs GSCZX (0.23). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (15 years) vs GSCZX (25 years). GSCZX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. GSCZX (14.18). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. GSCZX (-5.91).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 17.917 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 1.03B | 3,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.23 | 446% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 14.18 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 21.53 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -5.91 | -708% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 25.10 | 597% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers