Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs HFMDX
FSSNX vs HFMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs HFMDX
FSSNX vs HFMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. HFMDX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and HFMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. HFMDX (1.3B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than HFMDX: FSSNX (1.02) vs HFMDX (0.01). FSSNX was incepted earlier than HFMDX: FSSNX (15 years) vs HFMDX (23 years). HFMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). HFMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFMDX: FSSNX (0) vs HFMDX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.59 vs. HFMDX (20.88). FSSNX (37.15) and HFMDX (36.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSSNX | HFMDX | FSSNX / HFMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.34 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.34 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.926 | 16.196 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 1.3B | 2,678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.01 | 15,407% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.59 | 20.88 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.19 | 34.87 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.15 | 36.66 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 155.97 | 45.02 | 346% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement