Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs HFMDX
FSSNX vs HFMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs HFMDX
FSSNX vs HFMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. HFMDX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and HFMDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. HFMDX (1.34B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than HFMDX: FSSNX (0.92) vs HFMDX (0.01). FSSNX was incepted earlier than HFMDX: FSSNX (15 years) vs HFMDX (23 years). HFMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). HFMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFMDX: FSSNX (0) vs HFMDX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.49 vs. HFMDX (26.54). HFMDX return over 5 years is better than : 36.21 vs. FSSNX (32.17).
| FSSNX | HFMDX | FSSNX / HFMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.34 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.34 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.269 | 19.062 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 1.34B | 2,543% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.01 | 13,318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.49 | 26.54 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.35 | 44.29 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.17 | 36.21 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.42 | 52.65 | 303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers