Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs HICGX
FSSNX vs HICGX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs HICGX
FSSNX vs HICGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. HICGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and HICGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. HICGX (464M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than HICGX: FSSNX (1.06) vs HICGX (0.06). FSSNX was incepted earlier than HICGX: FSSNX (15 years) vs HICGX (18 years). HICGX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). HICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HICGX: FSSNX (0) vs HICGX (250000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.33 vs. HICGX (16.35). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.88 vs. HICGX (34.41).
| FSSNX | HICGX | FSSNX / HICGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.509 | 12.511 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 464M | 7,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.06 | 1,785% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.33 | 16.35 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.95 | 51.60 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.88 | 34.41 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.24 | 93.86 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement