Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMBCX
FSSNX vs LMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMBCX
FSSNX vs LMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMBCX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. LMBCX (147M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMBCX: FSSNX (1.02) vs LMBCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMBCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LMBCX (17 years). LMBCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBCX: FSSNX (0) vs LMBCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.85 vs. LMBCX (24.02). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.09 vs. LMBCX (2.31).
| FSSNX | LMBCX | FSSNX / LMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.05 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.07 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.854 | 15.647 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 147M | 23,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.85 | 24.02 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.77 | 41.36 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.09 | 2.31 | 1,691% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.38 | 23.05 | 622% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers