Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMBCX
FSSNX vs LMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMBCX
FSSNX vs LMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMBCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. LMBCX (147M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMBCX: FSSNX (1.02) vs LMBCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMBCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LMBCX (17 years). LMBCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LMBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBCX: FSSNX (0) vs LMBCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.36 vs. LMBCX (25.49). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. LMBCX (-0.93).
| FSSNX | LMBCX | FSSNX / LMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.05 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.07 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.477 | 16.918 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 147M | 23,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.36 | 25.49 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.10 | 48.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.27 | -0.93 | -3,904% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.87 | 30.21 | 536% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers