Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMBMX
FSSNX vs LMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMBMX
FSSNX vs LMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMBMX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. LMBMX (151M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMBMX: FSSNX (1.05) vs LMBMX (0.34). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMBMX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LMBMX (14 years). LMBMX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. LMBMX (48.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMBMX: FSSNX (0) vs LMBMX (1000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.78 vs. LMBMX (13.57). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 35.93 vs. LMBMX (11.02).
| FSSNX | LMBMX | FSSNX / LMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.527 | 16.733 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 151M | 22,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.34 | 304% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.78 | 13.57 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.56 | 56.72 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.93 | 11.02 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.50 | 46.58 | 297% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement