Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMSAX
FSSNX vs LMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMSAX
FSSNX vs LMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMSAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. LMSAX (725M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMSAX: FSSNX (0.92) vs LMSAX (0.39). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMSAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LMSAX (17 years). LMSAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs LMSAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. LMSAX (17.63). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. LMSAX (-15.64).
| FSSNX | LMSAX | FSSNX / LMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.07 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.13 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 11.167 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 725M | 4,690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.39 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 17.63 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 15.82 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -15.64 | -215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 27.84 | 543% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement