Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.35M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. LZCOX (31.3M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.80) vs LZCOX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. LZCOX (-20.10). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. LZCOX (-24.01).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.322 | -8.951 | -71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 31.3M | 92,652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | -20.10 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.74 | -16.58 | -197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | -24.01 | -155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.31 | -28.46 | -338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement