Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.82
Change+$0.37 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.92
Change+$0.05 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LZCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. LZCOX (34M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.84) vs LZCOX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. LZCOX (-11.43). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.74 vs. LZCOX (-9.65).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.273 | -4.524 | -183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 34M | 81,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | -11.43 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.98 | -8.40 | -476% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.74 | -9.65 | -650% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.00 | -23.12 | -445% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement