Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.64
Change-$0.15 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.60
Change-$0.44 (-4.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.51M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. LZCOX (32.5M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.90) vs LZCOX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. LZCOX (-17.81). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. LZCOX (-16.00).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.468 | -7.603 | -46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 32.5M | 79,692% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | -17.81 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | -23.63 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | -16.00 | -322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.72 | -30.34 | -283% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement