Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. LZCOX (36.6M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (1.02) vs LZCOX (0.33). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. LZCOX (21.07). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. LZCOX (-20.38).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 19.602 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 36.6M | 95,355% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.33 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 21.07 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 4.14 | 1,476% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -20.38 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | -4.01 | -3,733% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement