Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LZCOX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. LZCOX (35.5M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (1.06) vs LZCOX (0.35). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LZCOX (30 years). LZCOX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. LZCOX (19.91). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. LZCOX (-22.77).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 16.318 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 35.5M | 96,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.35 | 303% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 19.91 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | -0.85 | -6,280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | -22.77 | -167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | -6.20 | -2,361% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers