Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. LZCOX (36.3M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.92) vs LZCOX (0.35). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.33 vs. LZCOX (27.37). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.42 vs. LZCOX (-24.89).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.59 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.720 | 16.617 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 36.3M | 93,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.35 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.33 | 27.37 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.43 | 6.70 | 1,007% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.42 | -24.89 | -138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.35 | -4.90 | -3,132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers