Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZSCX
FSSNX vs LZSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZSCX
FSSNX vs LZSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZSCX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LZSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. LZSCX (34.6M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZSCX: FSSNX (1.05) vs LZSCX (0.68). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZSCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LZSCX (35 years). LZSCX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSSNX (80.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSCX: FSSNX (0) vs LZSCX (10000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.52 vs. LZSCX (14.05). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.83 vs. LZSCX (-19.24).
| FSSNX | LZSCX | FSSNX / LZSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.26 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.013 | 13.751 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 34.6M | 99,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.68 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.52 | 14.05 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 8.83 | 720% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.83 | -19.24 | -191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.95 | 3.27 | 4,336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers