Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZSCX
FSSNX vs LZSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZSCX
FSSNX vs LZSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZSCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LZSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. LZSCX (36.3M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZSCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs LZSCX (0.51). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZSCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs LZSCX (35 years). LZSCX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSCX: FSSNX (0) vs LZSCX (10000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. LZSCX (28.57). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. LZSCX (-19.62).
| FSSNX | LZSCX | FSSNX / LZSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.26 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 16.824 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 36.3M | 93,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.51 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 28.57 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 11.59 | 569% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -19.62 | -171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 5.34 | 2,830% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement