Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs MKSPX
FSSNX vs MKSPX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs MKSPX
FSSNX vs MKSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. MKSPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and MKSPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. MKSPX (973M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than MKSPX: FSSNX (0.92) vs MKSPX (0.50). FSSNX was incepted earlier than MKSPX: FSSNX (15 years) vs MKSPX (8 years). MKSPX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). MKSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKSPX: FSSNX (0) vs MKSPX (5000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.83 vs. MKSPX (34.58). MKSPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.62 vs. FSSNX (34.97).
| FSSNX | MKSPX | FSSNX / MKSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.43 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.67 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.759 | 23.141 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 973M | 3,494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.50 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.83 | 34.58 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.45 | 66.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | 42.62 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement