Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs MKSPX
FSSNX vs MKSPX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs MKSPX
FSSNX vs MKSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. MKSPX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and MKSPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. MKSPX (972M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than MKSPX: FSSNX (1.06) vs MKSPX (0.58). FSSNX was incepted earlier than MKSPX: FSSNX (15 years) vs MKSPX (9 years). MKSPX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). MKSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKSPX: FSSNX (0) vs MKSPX (5000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. MKSPX (28.61). FSSNX (38.13) and MKSPX (37.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSSNX | MKSPX | FSSNX / MKSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.43 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.67 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 19.186 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 972M | 3,508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.58 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 28.61 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 49.55 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 37.65 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers