Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs MSCDX
FSSNX vs MSCDX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs MSCDX
FSSNX vs MSCDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. MSCDX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and MSCDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. MSCDX (568M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than MSCDX: FSSNX (1.05) vs MSCDX (0.47). FSSNX was incepted earlier than MSCDX: FSSNX (15 years) vs MSCDX (22 years). MSCDX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. MSCDX (40.00). FSSNX (0) and MSCDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.73 vs. MSCDX (7.47). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.40 vs. MSCDX (6.42).
| FSSNX | MSCDX | FSSNX / MSCDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.013 | 14.302 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 568M | 6,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.47 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.73 | 7.47 | 304% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.23 | 24.90 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.40 | 6.42 | 567% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.49 | 53.05 | 263% |