Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. NMSAX (2.54B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.27) vs FSSNX (0.90). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. NMSAX (-10.31). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.63 vs. NMSAX (4.51).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.253 | -7.190 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 2.54B | 1,022% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.27 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | -10.31 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.29 | -16.77 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.63 | 4.51 | 1,034% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.26 | -0.78 | -10,283% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers