Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. NMSAX (2.44B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.20) vs FSSNX (0.80). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. NMSAX (-15.72). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. NMSAX (-2.73).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.322 | -4.191 | -151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 2.44B | 1,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.20 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | -15.72 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.74 | -9.45 | -347% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | -2.73 | -1,363% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.31 | 3.84 | 2,506% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement