Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.85
Change+$0.37 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.46
Change+$0.13 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. NMSAX (2.62B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.28) vs FSSNX (0.92). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. NMSAX (-5.90). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.47 vs. NMSAX (18.87).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.614 | -5.911 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 2.62B | 977% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.03 | -5.90 | -187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | -4.47 | -791% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.47 | 18.87 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.10 | -0.68 | -11,181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement