Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.28
Change-$0.83 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.16B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.21
Change-$0.62 (-2.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. NMSAX (2.78B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: FSSNX (1.36) vs NMSAX (1.18). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (13 years) vs NMSAX (28 years). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.61 vs. NMSAX (-5.23). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. NMSAX (0.24).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.445 | -2.029 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 2.78B | 980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.18 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.61 | -5.23 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.37 | -13.91 | -118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 0.24 | 15,580% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.57 | 2.07 | 3,561% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...