Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$23.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.96B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. NMSAX (2.96B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: FSSNX (1.36) vs NMSAX (1.18). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (13 years) vs NMSAX (28 years). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. NMSAX (1.96). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NMSAX (1.89).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.095 | 2.426 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 2.96B | 915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.18 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | 1.96 | 1,024% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.99 | -14.78 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 1.89 | 2,113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.83 | 12.75 | 705% |