Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.27
Change+$0.46 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$20.43
Change+$0.37 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. NMSAX (2.44B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.35) vs FSSNX (1.16). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.73 vs. NMSAX (-16.17). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.34 vs. NMSAX (18.15).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.368 | -11.513 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 2.44B | 972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.35 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.73 | -16.17 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.54 | -15.45 | -120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.34 | 18.15 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.12 | -8.01 | -713% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers