Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. NMSAX (2.48B). FSSNX (0.92) and NMSAX (0.91) have matching dividends . FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.21 vs. NMSAX (27.72). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 35.65 vs. NMSAX (-10.89).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.757 | 19.484 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 2.48B | 1,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.21 | 27.72 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.03 | 19.89 | 357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.65 | -10.89 | -327% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.28 | 34.23 | 489% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers