Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. NMSAX (2.57B). FSSNX (0.92) and NMSAX (0.91) have matching dividends . FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. NMSAX (19.77). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. NMSAX (-16.57).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 15.164 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 2.57B | 1,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 19.77 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 11.86 | 556% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -16.57 | -203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 24.23 | 623% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement