Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NSCCX
FSSNX vs NSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NSCCX
FSSNX vs NSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NSCCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. NSCCX (310M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NSCCX: FSSNX (1.02) vs NSCCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NSCCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NSCCX (22 years). NSCCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSCCX: FSSNX (0) vs NSCCX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. NSCCX (17.64). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. NSCCX (-4.65).
| FSSNX | NSCCX | FSSNX / NSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.95 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.05 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 21.123 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 310M | 11,258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 17.64 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 14.53 | 421% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -4.65 | -900% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 9.13 | 1,639% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers