Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NSGRX
FSSNX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NSGRX
FSSNX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NSGRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. NSGRX (377M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NSGRX: FSSNX (1.05) vs NSGRX (0.57). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NSGRX (27 years). NSGRX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. NSGRX (18.92). FSSNX (0) and NSGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. NSGRX (5.24). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. NSGRX (-9.28).
| FSSNX | NSGRX | FSSNX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.51 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.495 | 19.115 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 377M | 9,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.57 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | 5.24 | 400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.87 | 13.97 | 450% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | -9.28 | -390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.89 | 46.35 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement