Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NSGRX
FSSNX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NSGRX
FSSNX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NSGRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. NSGRX (379M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NSGRX: FSSNX (0.92) vs NSGRX (0.59). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NSGRX (27 years). NSGRX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.68 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and NSGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. NSGRX (18.81). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. NSGRX (-12.72).
| FSSNX | NSGRX | FSSNX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.52 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.57 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 16.012 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 379M | 8,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.59 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 18.81 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 13.33 | 495% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -12.72 | -264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 47.93 | 315% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement