Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NSGRX
FSSNX vs NSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NSGRX
FSSNX vs NSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NSGRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. NSGRX (392M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NSGRX: FSSNX (1.02) vs NSGRX (0.56). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NSGRX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NSGRX (27 years). NSGRX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.92 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and NSGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. NSGRX (16.50). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. NSGRX (-6.01).
| FSSNX | NSGRX | FSSNX / NSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.52 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.57 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 21.804 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 392M | 8,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.56 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 16.50 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 13.17 | 465% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -6.01 | -696% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 50.01 | 299% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers