Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NSIDX
FSSNX vs NSIDX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NSIDX
FSSNX vs NSIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NSIDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NSIDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. NSIDX (1.55B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NSIDX: FSSNX (1.05) vs NSIDX (0.89). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NSIDX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NSIDX (27 years). NSIDX (0.16) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. NSIDX (22.10). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSIDX: FSSNX (0) vs NSIDX (2500). FSSNX (20.98) and NSIDX (20.27) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. NSIDX (11.17).
| FSSNX | NSIDX | FSSNX / NSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.10 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.16 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.495 | 17.388 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 1.55B | 2,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.89 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | 20.27 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.87 | 52.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | 11.17 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.89 | 73.52 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement