Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NSMVX
FSSNX vs NSMVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NSMVX
FSSNX vs NSMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NSMVX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NSMVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. NSMVX (185M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NSMVX: FSSNX (0.92) vs NSMVX (0.45). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NSMVX: FSSNX (15 years) vs NSMVX (13 years). NSMVX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NSMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSMVX: FSSNX (0) vs NSMVX (5000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.33 vs. NSMVX (17.69). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.42 vs. NSMVX (-3.15).
| FSSNX | NSMVX | FSSNX / NSMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.720 | 11.852 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 185M | 18,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.45 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.33 | 17.69 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.43 | 38.07 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.42 | -3.15 | -1,092% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.35 | 97.91 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement