Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.63
Change+$0.44 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$25.96
Change+$0.49 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. QLSCX (1.33B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (1.10) vs QLSCX (0.38). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. FSSNX (3.90). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. QLSCX (42.19).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.383 | -5.034 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 1.33B | 1,868% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.38 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 6.77 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.69 | 12.59 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.42 | 42.19 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement