Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$26.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Sep 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. QLSCX (1.37B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs QLSCX (0.30). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs QLSCX (8 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.61 vs. FSSNX (22.13). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. QLSCX (41.46).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.932 | 12.841 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 1.37B | 1,999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.30 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.13 | 28.61 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.61 | -6.81 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.42 | 41.46 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...