Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.18
Change+$0.32 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.29
Change+$0.33 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. QLSCX (1.51B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (0.82) vs QLSCX (0.32). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. FSSNX (13.73). QLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.30 vs. FSSNX (56.96).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.488 | 12.938 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 1.51B | 1,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.32 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | 15.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.49 | 60.04 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.96 | 60.30 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement