Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.65
Change+$0.30 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.87
Change+$0.30 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and QLSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. QLSCX (1.46B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs QLSCX (0.30). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.45 vs. FSSNX (19.01). FSSNX (47.92) and QLSCX (46.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.421 | 3.915 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 1.46B | 1,861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.30 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.01 | 21.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.12 | 16.46 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.92 | 46.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...