Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.92
Change-$1.28 (-4.38%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$26.86
Change-$1.11 (-3.97%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. QLSCX (1.48B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs QLSCX (0.30). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs QLSCX (8 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.01 vs. FSSNX (19.49). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.38 vs. QLSCX (41.13).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.770 | 19.326 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5B | 1.48B | 1,999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.30 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.49 | 23.01 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.65 | 11.60 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.38 | 41.13 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...