Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. QLSCX (2.3B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (1.02) vs QLSCX (0.27). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs QLSCX (10 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. QLSCX (27.47). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. QLSCX (28.08).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 20.415 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 2.3B | 1,517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.27 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 27.47 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 62.09 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | 28.08 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 126.73 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers