Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. QLSCX (2.21B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs QLSCX (0.28). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs QLSCX (10 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.83 vs. QLSCX (31.94). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.97 vs. QLSCX (22.91).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.759 | 19.641 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 2.21B | 1,541% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.28 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.83 | 31.94 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.45 | 70.06 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | 22.91 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers