Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QSMLX
FSSNX vs QSMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QSMLX
FSSNX vs QSMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QSMLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QSMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. QSMLX (366M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QSMLX: FSSNX (1.02) vs QSMLX (0.24). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QSMLX: FSSNX (15 years) vs QSMLX (13 years). QSMLX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMLX: FSSNX (0) vs QSMLX (5000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. QSMLX (26.02). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. QSMLX (29.40).
| FSSNX | QSMLX | FSSNX / QSMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 23.844 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 366M | 9,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.24 | 423% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 26.02 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 38.22 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | 29.40 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 81.96 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers