Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QSMLX
FSSNX vs QSMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QSMLX
FSSNX vs QSMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QSMLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and QSMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. QSMLX (367M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QSMLX: FSSNX (0.92) vs QSMLX (0.25). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QSMLX: FSSNX (15 years) vs QSMLX (13 years). QSMLX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QSMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QSMLX: FSSNX (0) vs QSMLX (5000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. QSMLX (31.44). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. QSMLX (21.92).
| FSSNX | QSMLX | FSSNX / QSMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 20.870 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 367M | 9,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.25 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 31.44 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 44.58 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | 21.92 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 84.84 | 178% |