Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RLECX
FSSNX vs RLECX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RLECX
FSSNX vs RLECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RLECX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RLECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. RLECX (997M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RLECX: FSSNX (1.02) vs RLECX (0.30). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RLECX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RLECX (18 years). RLECX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RLECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RLECX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. RLECX (22.49). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. RLECX (-24.72).
| FSSNX | RLECX | FSSNX / RLECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 21.518 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 997M | 3,501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.30 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 22.49 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 16.63 | 368% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -24.72 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | -3.88 | -3,858% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers