Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RLECX
FSSNX vs RLECX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RLECX
FSSNX vs RLECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RLECX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RLECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. RLECX (975M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RLECX: FSSNX (1.06) vs RLECX (0.31). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RLECX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RLECX (18 years). RLECX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RLECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RLECX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. RLECX (22.73). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. RLECX (-26.65).
| FSSNX | RLECX | FSSNX / RLECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 19.632 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 975M | 3,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.31 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 22.73 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 11.50 | 467% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | -26.65 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | -4.51 | -3,248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers