Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RLECX
FSSNX vs RLECX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RLECX
FSSNX vs RLECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RLECX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and RLECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RLECX (1B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RLECX: FSSNX (0.92) vs RLECX (0.32). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RLECX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RLECX (18 years). RLECX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RLECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RLECX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.21 vs. RLECX (26.96). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 35.65 vs. RLECX (-28.02).
| FSSNX | RLECX | FSSNX / RLECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.11 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.757 | 19.536 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 1B | 3,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.32 | 290% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.21 | 26.96 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.03 | 20.42 | 348% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.65 | -28.02 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.28 | 1.05 | 15,958% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement