Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RLESX
FSSNX vs RLESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RLESX
FSSNX vs RLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RLESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and RLESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RLESX (1B). RLESX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: RLESX (0.97) vs FSSNX (0.92). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RLESX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RLESX (18 years). RLESX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RLESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.83 vs. RLESX (30.30). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.97 vs. RLESX (-17.74).
| FSSNX | RLESX | FSSNX / RLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.07 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.11 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.759 | 20.172 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 1B | 3,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.97 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.83 | 30.30 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.45 | 29.28 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | -17.74 | -197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.50 | 22.35 | 759% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement