Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RLESX
FSSNX vs RLESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RLESX
FSSNX vs RLESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RLESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RLESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. RLESX (997M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RLESX: FSSNX (1.02) vs RLESX (0.91). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RLESX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RLESX (18 years). RLESX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RLESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RLESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. RLESX (25.66). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. RLESX (-13.99).
| FSSNX | RLESX | FSSNX / RLESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.07 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.11 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 22.201 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 997M | 3,501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 25.66 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 25.20 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -13.99 | -299% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 16.31 | 918% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers