Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RLSMX
FSSNX vs RLSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RLSMX
FSSNX vs RLSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RLSMX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and RLSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RLSMX (37.1M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RLSMX: FSSNX (0.92) vs RLSMX (0.55). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RLSMX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RLSMX (6 years). RLSMX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RLSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSMX: FSSNX (0) vs RLSMX (1000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.21 vs. RLSMX (31.72). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 35.65 vs. RLSMX (-15.41).
| FSSNX | RLSMX | FSSNX / RLSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.24 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.757 | 21.026 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 37.1M | 91,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.55 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.21 | 31.72 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.03 | 16.82 | 422% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.65 | -15.41 | -231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers