Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RMCFX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.12
Change-$0.69 (-2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.76B
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RMCFX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.8B vs. RMCFX (272M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FSSNX (1.06) vs RMCFX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FSSNX (14 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: FSSNX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.00 vs. RMCFX (-9.96). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 49.75 vs. RMCFX (5.86).
| FSSNX | RMCFX | FSSNX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.55 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.756 | -9.378 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.8B | 272M | 9,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.00 | -9.96 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.96 | -12.70 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.75 | 5.86 | 850% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.52 | -28.98 | -233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...