Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RMCFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. RMCFX (406M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FSSNX (1.02) vs RMCFX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: FSSNX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). FSSNX (35.03) and RMCFX (34.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. RMCFX (-2.39).
| FSSNX | RMCFX | FSSNX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 37.970 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 406M | 8,596% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 34.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 37.45 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -2.39 | -1,747% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 30.93 | 484% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement