Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RMCFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. RMCFX (390M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FSSNX (1.06) vs RMCFX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: FSSNX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. RMCFX (31.03). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. RMCFX (-8.02).
| FSSNX | RMCFX | FSSNX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 33.741 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 390M | 8,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 31.03 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 28.78 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | -8.02 | -476% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | 26.80 | 546% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement