Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RMCFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RMCFX (414M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FSSNX (0.92) vs RMCFX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: FSSNX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). RMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.62 vs. FSSNX (43.21). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 35.65 vs. RMCFX (-3.24).
| FSSNX | RMCFX | FSSNX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.757 | 40.132 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 414M | 8,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.21 | 47.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.03 | 46.75 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.65 | -3.24 | -1,099% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.28 | 39.95 | 419% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement