Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RPMFX
FSSNX vs RPMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RPMFX
FSSNX vs RPMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RPMFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RPMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. RPMFX (718M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RPMFX: FSSNX (1.06) vs RPMFX (0.11). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RPMFX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RPMFX (8 years). RPMFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RPMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMFX: FSSNX (0) vs RPMFX (5000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. RPMFX (25.99). RPMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. FSSNX (38.13).
| FSSNX | RPMFX | FSSNX / RPMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 26.527 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 718M | 4,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.11 | 921% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 25.99 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 42.59 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 50.57 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers