Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RSCRX
FSSNX vs RSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RSCRX
FSSNX vs RSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RSCRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RSCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. RSCRX (997M). FSSNX (1.02) and RSCRX (0.99) have matching dividends . FSSNX was incepted earlier than RSCRX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RSCRX (10 years). RSCRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RSCRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. RSCRX (25.83). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. RSCRX (-13.62).
| FSSNX | RSCRX | FSSNX / RSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 22.248 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 997M | 3,501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.99 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 25.83 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 25.66 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -13.62 | -307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 17.97 | 833% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement