Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RSCRX
FSSNX vs RSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RSCRX
FSSNX vs RSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RSCRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and RSCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RSCRX (976M). RSCRX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: RSCRX (1.05) vs FSSNX (0.92). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RSCRX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RSCRX (10 years). RSCRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RSCRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. RSCRX (29.11). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. RSCRX (-19.77).
| FSSNX | RSCRX | FSSNX / RSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 16.628 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 976M | 3,484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 29.11 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 25.93 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -19.77 | -170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 16.93 | 892% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement