Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RSCRX
FSSNX vs RSCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RSCRX
FSSNX vs RSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RSCRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and RSCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RSCRX (1B). RSCRX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: RSCRX (1.05) vs FSSNX (0.92). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RSCRX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RSCRX (10 years). RSCRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and RSCRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.83 vs. RSCRX (29.26). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.97 vs. RSCRX (-18.32).
| FSSNX | RSCRX | FSSNX / RSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.759 | 20.453 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 1B | 3,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.83 | 29.26 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.45 | 30.06 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | -18.32 | -191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.50 | 24.32 | 697% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers