Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RUDAX
FSSNX vs RUDAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RUDAX
FSSNX vs RUDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RUDAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RUDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. RUDAX (301M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RUDAX: FSSNX (1.02) vs RUDAX (0.89). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RUDAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RUDAX (10 years). RUDAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.55 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RUDAX: FSSNX (0) vs RUDAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.03 vs. RUDAX (-8.11). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. RUDAX (-28.81).
| FSSNX | RUDAX | FSSNX / RUDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.56 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 22.065 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 301M | 11,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | -8.11 | -432% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | -11.83 | -517% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | -28.81 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | -5.02 | -2,985% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers