Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RUDAX
FSSNX vs RUDAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RUDAX
FSSNX vs RUDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RUDAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and RUDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RUDAX (288M). RUDAX (0.94) and FSSNX (0.92) have matching dividends . FSSNX was incepted earlier than RUDAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RUDAX (10 years). RUDAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.55 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RUDAX: FSSNX (0) vs RUDAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. RUDAX (-4.21). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. RUDAX (-36.49).
| FSSNX | RUDAX | FSSNX / RUDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.56 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 16.054 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 288M | 11,806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | -4.21 | -1,005% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | -12.59 | -524% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -36.49 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | -7.17 | -2,108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement