Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RYMCX
FSSNX vs RYMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RYMCX
FSSNX vs RYMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RYMCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and RYMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. RYMCX (399M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RYMCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs RYMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RYMCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs RYMCX (28 years). RYMCX (2.49) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RYMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMCX: FSSNX (0) vs RYMCX (2000). RYMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.11 vs. FSSNX (42.28). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. RYMCX (-8.75).
| FSSNX | RYMCX | FSSNX / RYMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.24 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.49 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 37.215 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 399M | 8,521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 49.11 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | 43.01 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -8.75 | -384% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | 19.38 | 779% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement