Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCRZX
FSSNX vs SCRZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCRZX
FSSNX vs SCRZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCRZX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SCRZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. SCRZX (840M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCRZX: FSSNX (1.06) vs SCRZX (0.46). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCRZX: FSSNX (15 years) vs SCRZX (11 years). SCRZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and SCRZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. SCRZX (18.21). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. SCRZX (-5.64).
| FSSNX | SCRZX | FSSNX / SCRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 19.794 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 840M | 4,060% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.46 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 18.21 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 8.37 | 641% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | -5.64 | -676% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | 43.46 | 337% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers