Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SMCIX
FSSNX vs SMCIX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SMCIX
FSSNX vs SMCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SMCIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SMCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. SMCIX (49.7M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SMCIX: FSSNX (1.06) vs SMCIX (0.79). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SMCIX: FSSNX (15 years) vs SMCIX (30 years). SMCIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SMCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMCIX: FSSNX (0) vs SMCIX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. SMCIX (22.53). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. SMCIX (-2.23).
| FSSNX | SMCIX | FSSNX / SMCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.86 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.86 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 21.269 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 49.7M | 68,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.79 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 22.53 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 18.08 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | -2.23 | -1,708% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | 34.45 | 425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers