Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SMECX
FSSNX vs SMECX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SMECX
FSSNX vs SMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SMECX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. SMECX (1.1B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SMECX: FSSNX (1.05) vs SMECX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SMECX: FSSNX (15 years) vs SMECX (26 years). SMECX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. SMECX (60.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMECX: FSSNX (0) vs SMECX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. SMECX (-6.48). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. SMECX (-29.31).
| FSSNX | SMECX | FSSNX / SMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.97 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.97 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.495 | 10.883 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 1.1B | 3,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | -6.48 | -324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.87 | 9.90 | 635% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | -29.31 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.89 | -25.02 | -563% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement