Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs STMSX
FSSNX vs STMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs STMSX
FSSNX vs STMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. STMSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and STMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. STMSX (751M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than STMSX: FSSNX (1.05) vs STMSX (0.21). FSSNX was incepted earlier than STMSX: FSSNX (15 years) vs STMSX (26 years). STMSX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. STMSX (36.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than STMSX: FSSNX (0) vs STMSX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. STMSX (9.10). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. STMSX (-2.39).
| FSSNX | STMSX | FSSNX / STMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.10 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.24 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.495 | 12.794 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 751M | 4,594% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.21 | 510% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | 9.10 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.87 | 18.41 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | -2.39 | -1,515% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.89 | 50.10 | 281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers