Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SZCCX
FSSNX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SZCCX
FSSNX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SZCCX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SZCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. SZCCX (1.07B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: FSSNX (1.02) vs SZCCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs SZCCX (25 years). SZCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SZCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SZCCX: FSSNX (0) vs SZCCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.45 vs. SZCCX (10.31). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.18 vs. SZCCX (24.86).
| FSSNX | SZCCX | FSSNX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.94 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.826 | 11.787 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 1.07B | 3,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.45 | 10.31 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.82 | 31.48 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.18 | 24.86 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.63 | 98.57 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement