Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs TRCSX
FSSNX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs TRCSX
FSSNX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. TRCSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and TRCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. TRCSX (483M). TRCSX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: TRCSX (1.07) vs FSSNX (0.92). FSSNX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FSSNX (15 years) vs TRCSX (11 years). TRCSX (0.26) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). TRCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.90 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCSX: FSSNX (0) vs TRCSX (500000). FSSNX (43.21) and TRCSX (41.47) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 35.65 vs. TRCSX (33.09).
| FSSNX | TRCSX | FSSNX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.14 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.26 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.757 | 20.708 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 483M | 7,039% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.21 | 41.47 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.03 | 65.76 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.65 | 33.09 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.28 | 135.79 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement