Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs TRCSX
FSSNX vs TRCSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs TRCSX
FSSNX vs TRCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. TRCSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and TRCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. TRCSX (481M). TRCSX (1.03) and FSSNX (1.02) have matching dividends . FSSNX was incepted earlier than TRCSX: FSSNX (15 years) vs TRCSX (11 years). TRCSX (0.26) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). TRCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.90 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCSX: FSSNX (0) vs TRCSX (500000). FSSNX (35.03) and TRCSX (33.47) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. TRCSX (39.19).
| FSSNX | TRCSX | FSSNX / TRCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.14 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.26 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 20.766 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 481M | 7,256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.03 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 33.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 56.26 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | 39.19 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 120.32 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement