Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs TRZVX
FSSNX vs TRZVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs TRZVX
FSSNX vs TRZVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. TRZVX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and TRZVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. TRZVX (9.99B). TRZVX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: TRZVX (1.36) vs FSSNX (1.06). FSSNX was incepted earlier than TRZVX: FSSNX (15 years) vs TRZVX (6 years). TRZVX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). TRZVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.40 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and TRZVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. TRZVX (20.16). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. TRZVX (5.95).
| FSSNX | TRZVX | FSSNX / TRZVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.64 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 20.027 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 9.99B | 342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.36 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 20.16 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 22.10 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 5.95 | 641% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers