Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs TSCWX
FSSNX vs TSCWX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs TSCWX
FSSNX vs TSCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. TSCWX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and TSCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. TSCWX (4.21B). TSCWX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: TSCWX (1.33) vs FSSNX (1.02). FSSNX was incepted earlier than TSCWX: FSSNX (15 years) vs TSCWX (8 years). TSCWX (0.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). TSCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and TSCWX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.00 vs. TSCWX (32.71). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.47 vs. TSCWX (12.83).
| FSSNX | TSCWX | FSSNX / TSCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.40 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.477 | 24.488 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 4.21B | 830% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.33 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.00 | 32.71 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.96 | 52.92 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.47 | 12.83 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement