Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs TSCWX
FSSNX vs TSCWX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs TSCWX
FSSNX vs TSCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. TSCWX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and TSCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. TSCWX (4.28B). TSCWX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: TSCWX (1.39) vs FSSNX (1.06). FSSNX was incepted earlier than TSCWX: FSSNX (15 years) vs TSCWX (8 years). TSCWX (0.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). TSCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and TSCWX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.25 vs. TSCWX (28.92). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.82 vs. TSCWX (16.57).
| FSSNX | TSCWX | FSSNX / TSCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.40 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.553 | 26.127 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 4.28B | 797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.25 | 28.92 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.13 | 54.56 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.82 | 16.57 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement