Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WBCIX
FSSNX vs WBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WBCIX
FSSNX vs WBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WBCIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WBCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. WBCIX (260M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WBCIX: FSSNX (1.06) vs WBCIX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WBCIX: FSSNX (15 years) vs WBCIX (7 years). WBCIX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WBCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCIX: FSSNX (0) vs WBCIX (500000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. WBCIX (13.24). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. WBCIX (23.05).
| FSSNX | WBCIX | FSSNX / WBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.19 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 12.696 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 260M | 13,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 13.24 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 23.86 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 23.05 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers