Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGAX
FSSNX vs WHGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGAX
FSSNX vs WHGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WHGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. WHGAX (875M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGAX: FSSNX (1.06) vs WHGAX (0.54). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs WHGAX (7 years). WHGAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGAX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. WHGAX (9.26). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. WHGAX (9.39).
| FSSNX | WHGAX | FSSNX / WHGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 15.231 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 875M | 3,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.54 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 9.26 | 371% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 11.87 | 452% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 9.39 | 406% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers