Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGSX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.20
Change+$0.34 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$20.61
Change+$0.26 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGSX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WHGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WHGSX (1B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: FSSNX (0.92) vs WHGSX (0.84). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGSX (18 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.18 vs. WHGSX (-6.90). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. WHGSX (51.35).
| FSSNX | WHGSX | FSSNX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.879 | 0.494 | 380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 1B | 2,557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.84 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | -6.90 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 19.45 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.85 | 51.35 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.38 | 54.94 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement