Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. WHGSX (773M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: FSSNX (1.05) vs WHGSX (0.67). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FSSNX (15 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. WHGSX (63.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. WHGSX (-0.60). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. WHGSX (6.89).
| FSSNX | WHGSX | FSSNX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.06 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.495 | 10.209 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5B | 773M | 4,463% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.67 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | -0.60 | -3,512% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.87 | 13.91 | 452% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | 6.89 | 526% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.89 | 58.38 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement