Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. WHGSX (875M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: FSSNX (1.06) vs WHGSX (0.65). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FSSNX (15 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. WHGSX (9.47). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. WHGSX (10.21).
| FSSNX | WHGSX | FSSNX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.06 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 15.340 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 875M | 3,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.65 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 9.47 | 362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 12.37 | 434% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 10.21 | 373% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | 69.77 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers