Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.77M
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. WMMAX (226M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (1.36) vs WMMAX (0.29). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (13 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. WMMAX (-12.45). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. WMMAX (-40.57).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.095 | 1.007 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 226M | 11,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.29 | 469% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | -12.45 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.99 | -38.67 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -40.57 | -99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.83 | -33.09 | -271% |