Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.53
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.28
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.25M
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. WMMAX (192M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (1.16) vs WMMAX (0.01). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.21 vs. WMMAX (-20.92). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.76 vs. WMMAX (-23.39).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.731 | -3.559 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 192M | 12,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.01 | 8,397% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.21 | -20.92 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.82 | -32.22 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.76 | -23.39 | -247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.53 | -38.47 | -155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement