Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.48
Change+$0.41 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.87M
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. WMMAX (194M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (1.13) vs WMMAX (0.01). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.09 vs. WMMAX (-23.64). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 99.84 vs. WMMAX (-11.26).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.429 | -6.313 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 194M | 12,474% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.01 | 8,457% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | -23.64 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.04 | -41.19 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.84 | -11.26 | -886% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.42 | -41.37 | -136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...