Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.64
Change-$0.15 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.83
Change-$0.16 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.84M
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. WMMAX (201M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (0.90) vs WMMAX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). WMMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. FSSNX (8.73). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. WMMAX (-28.46).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.468 | 7.388 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 201M | 12,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 10.43 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | -31.85 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | -28.46 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.72 | -29.30 | -293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement