Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$12.45
Change-$0.07 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.93M
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. WMMAX (179M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (0.80) vs WMMAX (0.49). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. WMMAX (-17.56). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. WMMAX (-42.78).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.647 | -15.516 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 179M | 16,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.49 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | -17.56 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | -42.97 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.59 | -42.78 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.91 | -43.84 | -221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers